|
|
 |
|
|
|||||||
| Petri.co.il is happy to award auglan the title of Most Valuable Member !!! |
| Register |  Calendar |
 Search |
 Today's Posts |
Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
|
 |
Cache: 16Mb or 32Mbthis thread has 5 replies and has been viewed 1966 times
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
5th July 2009, 14:37
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Cache: 16Mb or 32Mb
Hi,
Anyone got any strong feelings on whether a 32Mb cached drive is better than 16Mb? I intend to use them in a RAID 5 SATA array and my planned size is 640Gb (based on the 2TB array size limitation of the Adaptec 2410SA). I'd also be interested in what drive models people prefer ... I tend to prefer Seagate and Hitachi, historically haven't liked Maxtor (though I think they may be Seagates too these days) but a friend of mine fair spits when he hears mention of Western Digital. Kyu |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ISA Cache | itian | General Security | 9 | 22nd February 2009 19:25 |
| NEW seagate barracuda 7200.11 500gb sata-II 32mb cache HDD wont show up in xp | rambo666999 | Windows 2000 Pro, XP Pro | 8 | 9th July 2008 02:45 |
| where is the cache or data? | James Haynes | VMware Virtualization | 0 | 23rd January 2007 17:46 |
| Cache problems? | plawlor | Windows 2000 Pro, XP Pro | 0 | 2nd October 2006 17:51 |
| DNS - cache | brummer | Windows Server 2000 / 2003 | 2 | 13th April 2004 21:18 |
(19)
Threaded Mode