![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Petri.co.il is happy to award auglan the title of Most Valuable Member !!! |
| Register | Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
|
|
PTR filteringthis thread has 13 replies and has been viewed 2315 times
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Can anyone tell me if MS Exchange 2003 has the ability to discard connections when a PTR record is not present for the sendee. IE if an email is sent from a domain that only has an MX record and not a reverse public record aswell that email would not be delivered and an NDR delivered instead indicating to the sendee that the "said" domain does not accept email from domains with no valid PTR record. I know exchange has the ability to do a reverse look up on the SMTP connector. But this only allows for reverse DNS information to be appended to the message headers which in my opinion is a bit of a useless feature and a possible uneccesary over head on your mail server. Finally assuming exchange doesnt have this feature (which im pretty sure of
|
|
#2
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Exchange cannot drop messages based on the reverse DNS record. You will have to use a third party tool to do that. Something like Vamsoft ORF should do that.
Simon.
__________________
-- Simon Butler Exchange MVP Blog: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ More Exchange Content: http://exchange.sembee.info/ Exchange Resources List: http://exbpa.com/ In the UK? Hire me: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ |
|
#3
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Why have MS incooperated a feature in SMTP that most Exchange admins believe adds resilience to there exchange enviroment in terms of combating SPAM? When in reality the reverse look up feature merely adds more information to a message header that could possibly be entirely inaccurate? Seems like a bit of a waste of time to me. I guess its only a small foible as Exchange 2003 is a brilliant product and certainly my favoruite flavour to date. Do you know wether Exchange 2007 will incoperate this feature in SP1?
|
|
#4
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
You talk about Exchange 2007 SP1 as if it isn't already out. It is, and has been for a while.
The antispam features have been beefed up in Exchange 2007, but reverse DNS lookups is not part of the feature set - you still have to use third party tools. As to why MS put the option to do a reverse lookup - I have no idea on that. It is a useless option that simply slows down email processing. Simon.
__________________
-- Simon Butler Exchange MVP Blog: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ More Exchange Content: http://exchange.sembee.info/ Exchange Resources List: http://exbpa.com/ In the UK? Hire me: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ |
|
#5
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Exchange 2007 will never be supported in a 32 bit environment. SBS 2008 is 64 bit.
While there was a lot of missing functionality, the service pack did not change the antispam features. The core functionality was there from the start. Simon.
__________________
-- Simon Butler Exchange MVP Blog: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ More Exchange Content: http://exchange.sembee.info/ Exchange Resources List: http://exbpa.com/ In the UK? Hire me: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ |
|
#7
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
I think you will find that most SBS purchases are with new hardware, not upgrades. Furthermore if the server is less than two years old then they will already have 64 bit hardware. It is the way that Microsoft are going. All of their server products will be 64 bit only within a few years - I think Windows 2008 is the last 32 bit server OS.
Simon.
__________________
-- Simon Butler Exchange MVP Blog: http://blog.sembee.co.uk/ More Exchange Content: http://exchange.sembee.info/ Exchange Resources List: http://exbpa.com/ In the UK? Hire me: http://www.sembee.co.uk/ |
|
#9
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
my solution to the issue was a linux front end MTA running postfix.
spam levels dropped from 6-7 to single digit numbers, and email traffic has become much lower ________ Buy magic flight launch box Last edited by DYasny; 6th March 2011 at 20:30.. |
|
#10
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
as for secure SMTP, it is usually quite enough to drop all non RFC compliant connections
________ Mercedes-Benz Sl-Class Last edited by DYasny; 6th March 2011 at 20:30.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AD, DNS, Cisco 2600 serving up DHCP. Reverse PTR records not being removed from DNS. | leftleg | Active Directory | 6 | 11th April 2008 01:21 |
| Message Filtering | mdecourcy | Exchange 2007 / 2010 / 2013 | 4 | 14th November 2007 18:49 |
| DNS won't create PTR record in Reverse Lookup. | trep | SBS 2000 / 2003 | 3 | 1st November 2007 02:01 |
| web filtering | milo974 | Windows Server 2000 / 2003 | 1 | 11th July 2005 12:07 |
| Spam Filtering | ravx | Exchange 2000 / 2003 | 2 | 29th June 2005 16:14 |